Visit the Procter Fencing  Systems web site

Tall Storeys - the challenge of Fire Safety

A Passive Fire Protection Federation product story
Edited by the Buildingtalk editorial team May 4, 2007

Recent changes to Government guidance on fire safety do not include adequate provision for tall buildings says the Passive Fire Protection Federation.

Tall buildings are back in fashion.

The Mayor of London, Ken Livingston, recently announced he hopes to see 20 new skyscrapers in the capital by 2015.

Naturally the renewed impetus to build tall buildings in London will be widely reflected throughout Britain's other major cities.

But recent changes to Government guidance on fire safety, Approved Document B (AD B), do not include adequate provision for tall buildings, according to David Sugden of the Passive Fire Protection Federation (PFPF).

"AD B fails to give specific guidance for buildings that are significantly over 30m".

"So the regulations for the construction of a building 31m in height and one of 331m are the same! Yet clearly such buildings represent very different propositions, in terms of evacuation and collapse in the event of a fire." "Fires in modern tall buildings can last for more than 24 hours".

"But the guidance offered by AD B requires a structural resilience of just two hours," explains Sugden.

"Preventing fire movement within a building is also fundamental to fire safety and not covered with enough emphasis in AD B".

The Passive Fire Protection Federation (PFPF) draws its membership from across the fire safety community including industry, authorities and technical institutes.

Current regulations concentrate on the successful evacuation of burning buildings.

But property protection lies largely outside the scope of regulation.

This severely underestimates the true cost of fires.

Moreover AD B only provides recommendations applicable to the most common building situations.

It doesn't set out advice for complex multi-functional buildings.

The latest generation of tall buildings tend to combine residential, leisure and commercial uses and function outside traditional scenarios.

David Sugden continues, "We welcome the recent revisions to AD B which are very important but do not answer this problem".

"The trend towards taller and more complex multifunctional buildings presents significant challenges for fire safety".

"This needs to be resolved at the point of construction - so debate has to happen now.".

Not what you're looking for? Search the site.

Back to top Back to top

Contact Passive Fire Protection Federation

Related Stories

Contact Passive Fire Protection Federation

 

Newsletter sign up

Request your free weekly copy of the Buildingtalk email newsletter ...

Visit the Procter Fencing  Systems web site

Search by company

A Pro-talk Publication

A Pro-talk publication