Product category:
Infrastructure and CAD Software
News Release from: Version One | Subject: Coping with Buncefield oil depot fire
Edited by the Buildingtalk Editorial
Team on 24 January 2006
Coping with Buncefield oil depot fire
30% of companies surveyed said that they would never recover if their paper business documents were destroyed by a fire, flood, terrorist attack
In the wake of the devastating Buncefield oil depot fire in Hemel Hempstead, Poynton-based Version One has researched the views of senior personnel from 100 UK organisations The purpose of the research was to discover whether their businesses could survive the total destruction of all hard-copy business documents (invoices, purchase orders, statements, payroll, despatch notes etc)
This article was originally published on Buildingtalk on 3 Nov 2005 at 8.00am (UK)
Related stories
Version One document imaging solution
Leading timber company Palgrave Brown to reach new heights with DbArchive, Version One's document imaging solution.
Needlessly printing volumes of business document
Version One has identified that UK organisations are still contributing significantly to global warming by needlessly printing alarming volumes of business documents.
30% of those surveyed said that they would NEVER recover if their paper business documents were destroyed by a fire, flood, terrorist attack etc 32% of organisations would take a minimum of 12 months to recover and the remaining 38% would take approximately 6 months to recover.
This is despite 60% of organisations claiming to have business continuity plans in place! The financial cost of all business documents 'going up in smoke' is also significant.
All organisations would incur some financial cost with 45% incurring at least £50,000.
Further reading
Icopal to eliminate paper
Icopal, the world's largest manufacturer of roofing and building membranes for the construction industry, are going 100% electronic
Staff savings using data capture technology
Vision One study shows over a third of staff can be redeployed by using data capture technology.
32% of organisations would incur between £100,000 and £800,000 and 15% would have financial costs of more than £1 million! Key concerns by organisations (if all paper documents were destroyed) include "critical documents would be lost forever", "there would be legal and VAT implications" and "the business would lose SOX compliance".
In addition, some organisations state that the destruction of all hard-copy documents would:.
* Cause the business to go under.
* Be catastrophic.
* Be a nightmare.
* Result in redundancies.
* Make it virtually impossible to chase debt".
"This highlights the complete absence of measures organisations are taking to ensure business continuity", says Tony Bray, director of document management and imaging company, Version One.
"Many organisations think disasters such as the devastating fire at Buncefield just won't happen to them".
"This mentality is extremely alarming.
The only way organisations can ensure all business documents are protected in the event of a fire or flood, is by electronically storing all documentation from invoices and purchase orders through to despatch notes and technical drawings, as well as keeping back-up copies off-site".
In a recent article, Digby Jones, director general of the Confederation of British Industry, expressed similar concerns about the lack of business continuity plans at the Buncefield oil depot and neighbouring companies, "Evidence suggests that not as many companies had computer back-ups and other financial records stored off-site, as they should".
Tony adds, "Not only is electronically storing all incoming and outgoing documents common sense from a business continuity point of view, it also saves significant amounts of time, money and storage space.".
• Version One: contact details and other news
• Email this article to a colleague
• Register for the free Buildingtalk email newsletter
• Buildingtalk Home Page
Search the Pro-Talk network of sites
