“‘Smash and grab’ is a term used to describe an adjudication commenced by a party seeking payment where they claim the whole amount of the payment applied for simply on the basis that no payment/pay less notice was issued.
Such adjudications are also being referred to as ‘technical knockout’ adjudications. Whatever they’re called, as an employer dealing with a main contractor or as a main contractor dealing with a sub-contract supply chain, the key is to avoid being on the receiving end of one.
The principle that an employer has to ‘pay now and argue later’, in respect of a smash and grab adjudication, is now a matter of settled law.
In short, the employer has to pay the amount the adjudicator has decided is payable in the smash and grab adjudication before it can commence a further second adjudication in respect of what the true amount payable is (known as a ‘true value’ adjudication).
Given this state of play, it’s not surprising that employers and main contractors have been looking at ways to try and circumvent the pay now, argue later approach, where there has been a failure to issue a payment / pay less notice.
However, as in the recent case of J & B Hopkins Limited v Trant Engineering Limited  EWHC 1305 (TCC), the general approach of the Technology and Construction Court (TCC) is that, unless there is a genuine reason not to do so, it will seek to give effect to adjudicator’s decisions.
Therefore, more than ever it is important for employers and main contractors to comply fully with their payment obligations. The consequences of failing to issue valid and timely payment / pay less notices (as was the case here) opens the door to unwelcome smash and grab adjudications.
Attempts to defend these applications can often be futile, simply incurring additional costs both in respect of the adjudication process and potentially in relation to high court proceedings.
The harsh reality is that smash and grab adjudications are, for the time being at least, here to stay. Therefore, the key is that paying parties need to avoid leaving themselves open.
With this in mind, employers and main contractors need to check that they have the appropriate procedures in place across all projects, to ensure that payment deadlines are adhered to in order to keep the door firmly closed to ‘smash and grab’ adjudications.
Whilst employers and main contractors do have the opportunity to correct a failure to issue the required notices at a later date, cash flow may well be impacted on in the short term.
They’ll find themselves having to make a positive payment first, with the likely need to argue about it later.”
Nationwide Windows & Doors has devoted time, clever product design and testing at levels never previously seen to launch its next generation GRP fire door range.Posted in Access Control & Door Entry Systems, Articles, Building Industry News, Building Products & Structures, Doors, Health & Safety, Innovations & New Products, Retrofit & Renovation, Security and Fire Protection, Windows
Data showing spiking humidity levels on construction sites are a growing concern for the sector, according to a new report from temporary power company, Aggreko.Posted in Articles, Building Industry News, Building Services, Facility Management & Building Services, Health & Safety, Heating Systems, Controls and Management, Information Technology, Posts, Research & Materials Testing, Site Preparation, Thermal Imaging and Monitors
Leading housing provider Stonewater is taking full advantage of the excellent thermal efficiency of Kingspan Kooltherm K108 Cavity Board at a new affordable housing development in Dorset.Posted in Articles, Building Industry News, Building Products & Structures, Building Services, Case Studies, Insulation, Restoration & Refurbishment, Retrofit & Renovation, Walls
Freefoam has strong ties with contractors, architects and specifiers, thanks to its ‘The Power of Many’ approach.Posted in Articles, Building Industry News, Building Products & Structures, Cladding, Posts, Restoration & Refurbishment, Retrofit & Renovation, Roofs, Walls